Gmat -Awa

Guide to Perfect 6. 0 AWA GMAT Score 1. General building 1. 1 Argument introduction recapitulate line, point out flaws or state intention to discuss them below 1st Para First, second Para Second/In entree, third Para Third/Fin eithery, closedown The railway line is blemished/ faltering/un convincing because of the above -mentioned Ultimately, the argument nonify be streng soed if/by 1. 2 Issue Intro Restate hump, select a position 1st Para First/ maven actor 2nd Para Second/An otherwise reason tertiary Para Third/ by chance the best reasonConclusion endorse the other position unless(prenominal) re-affirm yours and conclude that it is the stronger. 2. Structural Word (should be completely over the attempts) Supporting examples for example, to embellish, for instance, because, specific alto substantiatehery Additional support further more, in addition, similarly, on the dot as, similarly, as a result, moreover Importance re onlyy, truly, undoubtedly, distinctly, in item, near importantly Contrast on the contrary, yet, despite, rather, instead, however, although, while Decide against one net non abnegate that, it could be argued that, granted, admittedly Ying-yang on the one hand/on the other handConcluding in that locationfore, in summary, consequently, hence, in stopping point, ultimately, in closing 3. Templates 3. 1 Argument Intro The argument claims that . (restate) Stated in this way the argument a) manipulates facts and conveys a distort view of the situation b) reveals examples of leap of faith, poor reasoning and ill-defined speech c) fails to mention some(prenominal) key factors, on the basis of which it could be evaluated The conclusion of the argument relies on assumptions for which in that location is no clear grounds. Hence, the argument is light/unconvincing and has several flaws. 1st ParaFirst, the argument readily assumes that This mastery is a stretch. For example, Clearly, The argument could shoot been much cle atomic number 18r if it explicitly verbalize that 2nd Para Second, the argument claims that. This is again a very weak and unsupported claim as the argument does not turn up both correlation amid. and To illustrate, While, However,. indeed. In fact, it is not at all clear rather. If the argument had provided severalise that.. whence the argument would have been a lot more convincing. 3rd Para Finally, (pose some questions for the argument)..Without convincing answers to these questions, one is left with the impression that the claim is more of a desirous have in masterminding rather than substantive separate. Conclusion In conclusion, the argument is flawed for the above-mentioned reasons and is therefore unconvincing. It could be well fortify if the ancestor clearly mentioned all the relevant facts. In order to quantify the merits of a received situation/decision, it is essential to have full knowledge of all change factors. In this particular subject. Without this information, the argument remains unsubstantiated and clean to debate. . 2 Issue Intro M each/some people think that. Others.. (restate) The issue is a controversial one but a appressed trial reveals that. (take a position) for several reasons. 1st Para hotshot reason is that/for For example, Furthermore, Clearly, 2nd Para Another reason is that/for To illustrate, As a result, 3rd Para Perhaps the best reason is (that). Specifically, Moreover/In addition. In fact,. at that placefore,. Conclusion In summary, while there be arguments to be do for both sides, it is clear that there ar expectanter advantages to. recap the reasons). Certainly,.. outweigh. Hence,. (re-affirm your position) 4. Going from the templates to full-fledged essays 4. 1 Argument ESSAY fountainhead The following appe ard in the editorial section of a subject tidings magazine The paygrade scheme for electronic naughtys is similar to the picture show order system in that it pr ovides consumers with a quick reference so that they can determine if the subject matter and contents are appropriate. This electronic farinaceous range system is not playing because it is self correct and the fines for violating the rating system are nominal.As a result an independent body should supervise the game industriousness and companies that knowingly violate the rating system should be prohibited from releasing a game for two years. Discuss how advantageously reasoned you find this argument. Point out flaws in the arguments logic and break apart the arguments underlying assumptions. In addition, evaluate how supporting picture is used and what evidence might counter the arguments conclusion. You whitethorn besides discuss what additional evidence could be used to specialismen the argument or what changes would make the argument more reproduciblely sound.YOUR RESPONSE Quote The argument claims that the electronic games rating system, although similar to the vi deo rating system, is not working because it is self regulated and misdemeanor fines are nominal, Hence, the gaming rating system should be overseen by an independent body. Stated in this way the argument fails to mention several key factors, on the basis of which it could be evaluated. The conclusion relies on assumptions, for which there is no clear evidence. thitherfore, the argument is rather weak, unconvincing, and has several flaws.First, the argument readily assumes that because the electronic game rating system is self regulated, it is not working well. This contestation is a stretch and not substantiated in every way. There are numerous examples in other areas of business or commerce, where the entities are self regulated and rather successful. For instance, FIA, the Formula1 racing organization is self regulated. Yet, the gaming is very popular and successful, toping millions of spectators around the world each year. Tickets are rather expensive, races are shown on pay -per-view, and nearly all drivers are nonrecreational very well.Another example is the paralleled movie rating system that the argument mentions. The author fails to clarify whether it is working well, but it is clear that the movie rating system is pretty well received by people, who a good deal base their decisions to go see a movie with kids or not on the movie rating. It has never been a case when someone would face cheated by the movie rating and express disappointment afterwards. Since the movie rating system is also self regulated, it follows that this regulative method is working pretty well and it is not obvious how it can be the reason for the poor electronic game rating system.The argument would have been much clearer if it explicitly gave examples of how the self regulatory system led to bad ratings and customer dissatisfaction. Second, the argument claims that any violation fees for bad electronic game ratings are nominal. It thus suggests that this is yet some oth er reason for the rating system not working. This is again a very weak and unsupported claim as the argument does not demonstrate any correlation between the monetary amount of the fines and the quality of the electronic game rating system. In fact, the argument does not even draw a parallel with the mentioned movie rating system and its violation fines.If any such correlation had been shown for the movie rating system, which supposedly works well, then the author would have sounded a bit more convincing. In addition, if the argument provided evidence that low violation fines lead to electronic game manufacturers to thin any regulations with respect to the game rating system, the argument could have been strengthened even further. Finally, the argument concludes that an independent body should oversee the game indus picture and companies that violate the rating system, should be punished.From this financial statement again, it is not at all clear how an independent regulatory body can do a better job than a self regulated one. Without supporting evidence and examples from other businesses where independent regulatory bodies have done a great job, one is left with the impression that the claim is more of a hungry(predicate) thinking rather than substantive evidence. As a result, this conclusion has no legs to stand on. In summary, the argument is flawed and therefore unconvincing. It could be considerably strengthened if the author clearly mentioned all the relevant facts.In order to assess the merits of a certain situation, it is essential to have full knowledge of all contributing factors. 4. 2 Issue ESSAY QUESTION Poor health and high prove levels diminish the productivity of todays function proles. In order to maximize pro tot ups, companies need to provide white-collar employees with informal act upon facilities and free health classes. In your opinion, how accurate is the view denotative above? Use reasons and/or examples from your own experi ence, observations, or reading to engender your position. YOUR RESPONSE QuoteSome people think that productivity at work could be increased if workers are provided with free exercise facilities and wellness classes, as this will advance the workers health and diminish the level of stress in the office. Other people support the claim that people should administer their own health and stress level outside the work space. The issue is a controversial one but a closer examination reveals that companies that promote reasoned living among their employees are indeed more productive. One reason is that people often do not find the motif or the energy to o to a wellness class and exercise outside of work. Most people are usually very shopworn by the end of the work day and have other family duties or priorities to worry about. For example, doing grocery shopping, cooking, picking up the kids from practice, etc. Therefore, it is very uncontrollable for such people to make time for exer cising and maintain vigorous habits. As a result, the stress from a long day of work at the office gets carried over to the abutting day and the pattern repeats. Eventually, the health of those people worsens and their productivity on the job diminishes.Another reason is that people often find it attractive to do what their friends or colleagues do. For instance, if five colleagues of a worker join a pilates class and are happy about it, they then tend to recommend it to the worker in question and she will finally join the class. Contagious behavior such as this can be very easily achieved on the job if pilates classes are offered, because then the breakthrough of the opportunity and the motivation to join are easily found. Hence, exercising at work becomes a very comfortable activity easily fit into a schedule and promotes the health and happiness of the employees.They not only feel better heath-wise after exercise, but also strengthen relationships with co-workers by doing act ivities together. In a way, this whole experience can be viewed as group building. Consequently, workers are more energized, alert and therefore productive in their jobs. Perhaps the best reason is that by providing free exercise facilities and wellness classes companies improve their image and become attractive places to be at for future employees. non only can such companies attract more viable candidates for vernal openings, but they can also retain longer the employees they already have.To illustrate this point, let us take Google for example. The company was recently ranked as the best one to work at. One of the main criteria for achieving this rank was the fact that the company takes very good care of its employees in terms of further healthy living. There are numerous sports facilities on the Google campus which people are encouraged to use. Those include gyms, swimming pools, volleyball courts, massage chairs, etc. in-person trainers are also available for free for anyo ne that needs them. There is also a health center facility on site.With that kind of surround it is difficult to not take advantage and live a healthy living, resulting in better productivity on the job. In summary, while there are arguments to be made for both sides of the issue, it is clear that there are much greater advantages for companies to provide their workers with free health facilities and classes. Workers find it not only much easier to take advantage of such opportunities on site, but also are much more motivated to do so there. Participating in sports activities improves the workers mood, desire to work hard, keeps them healthy, and creates a bond among workers.As a result, this translates to a better productivity of the workers and ultimately to maximized profits for the company. 5. Final tips During the tutorial type in a few sentences in the mock essay window to get used to the keyboard. Again during the tutorial, jot down on your notebook the basic structure of you r essays or the opening sentences in case you get too nervous and forget them when the clock starts ticking. Write as much as you can. Try to write at least viosterol words per essay. Always have the e-rater in mind as your probable reviewer.Remember that the human rater will make every effort to grade just like the e-rater. In that sense, keep your structure and volume in mind over actual quality/content. Be careful of spelling mistakes. twofold check words that you normally know you misspell (e. g. exercise). Try to fill out 2-3 minutes before time is up so you can easily re-read your essay for the purposes of spell checking. Do not reorganize/delete sentences/paragraphs with less than 2 min left. No matter how great you thought your essays went, try to stay humble and focused remember this was just a foreword and the real stuff hasnt started yetGood luck - Here is an essay I wrote for a PR Test Graded a 6. 0 (normally they grade harder than real thing) Prompt The autonomy of any rude is found on the strength of its borders if the number of unlawful immigrants entering a country cannot be checked, both its economy and national identity are endangered. Because banned immigrants pose such threats, every effort must be made to return them to their country of origin. Assignment Discuss how well-reasoned you find this argument.In your discussion, be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion. This argument relies firmly on unverified assumptions and has a very utmost(prenominal) conclusion.The author fails to make logical connecti ons between the evidence provided and the conclusion that all illegal aliens must be returned to their country of origin. The starting signal problem with the argument is that it suffers from multiple unsubstantiated claims. The first evidence that is given to support the extremum conclusion is that the autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders. This statement is also extreme because it infers that every countries autonomy could be ranked by the strength of its borders. There are many European countries that have very little strength exerted at the borders, but still maintain autonomy.The author should clarify this statement by grouping countries together or using a more vague statement that would include most countries but not all. The next statement in the argument is conditional phrase stating that the more illegal immigrants that enter a country the worse off the economy and national identity will be. While this statement might be unfeigned for some coun tries it is certainly not neat for all countries. The very buttocks of early US society was based on immigrant labor and husbandry that brought from over the sea. There are still many countries whose economy is heavily dependent on immigrant labor.Even though many economist feel this statement is true in the US today, most would disagree that this statement is true of all countries. The final portion of the authors argument is the conclusion. The conclusion states that the because of disadvantages mentioned earlier all illegal immigrants must be returned to their country of origin. Although this statement might advance to be a logical conclusion of this extreme argument it fails to take extra information into account. The author doesnt give any indication on how extreme these problems will be or how costly it will be to return the amount of illegal aliens to their home country.What if the cost to the economy was one-half the amount that it would cost to send all of the immigrant s back to their country of origin? The author could use some monetary figures to prove that some savings would be incurred if all illegal immigrants were deported. In conclusion, the argument suffers from logical flaws and makes an extreme conclusion based on unproven assumptions. The addition of hard examples and connections between the statements would prove to strengthen the argument. *This just shows you how you dont have to write great to get a good score*